On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the relevant portion of the proposed patch:
>
>> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64el)
>> DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mno-altivec
>> +DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mno-altivec
>> +endif
>> +# Build without Altivec to prevent FTBFS on ppc64el.
>> +ifneq (,$(filter mips64%el mips64%el,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)))
>> +DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mxgot
>> +DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mxgot
>> endif
>
> But the explanation is:
>
>> filter mips%64 mips%64el,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)
>> is due to we may has some other mips64 architectures in future,
>> for example: mips64r6{el}.
>
> The filter string differs between the patch and explanation:
The patch is correct.
Sorry for it.
>
> filter mips64%el mips64%el
>
> and
>
> filter mips%64 mips%64el.
>
> One is twice the same (typo?), the other has the percent sign placed
> differently.
>
> Please confirm the correct filter command, otherwise I cannot apply this
> patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Ghis
--
YunQiang Su
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
