-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Again:
On 21/11/15 13:06, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT <calcu...@rezozer.net> wrote: >> It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense >> to say so. >> For a least two reasons: >> 1] ` ./debian/rules get-orig-source ' gives the one in the git; >> 2] the one in the archive is certainly derive from the git itself. >> >> Do I miss something here ? >> What is the best way to fix this ? > > I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd > version of the orig.tar.xz. > I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?). It appeared that tar does not produced reproducible balls. > > So yes, the faulty one is in the archive. The uploader of your > package should have used 'pristine-tar checkout' instead of running > the get-orig-source rule. Ok. > > Unless there is something wrong with the version in the archive (have > you compared the files?), I suggest deleting > normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.id and > normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.delta from the pristine-tar branch and > running 'gbp import-orig' on the version that in the archive. > I have just done the dirty manoeuvre and some checks: it should be ok now. Thanks, Jerome -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWUUzCAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjemsH/3CPochrA3FT/2zkaqiQfBlP KNPZneD3No2AkW/KY/c0uk0d/Dz+ylv8SV5lx/AVzO+bEyUbb+CRoVNq8vgTYybT gnyz4vW1mKoW+z2/Yg0GseBYghL95d9wf10svhNY55pRFBcJj2E5klp2JXCBPLmh oRrblGYUAYUoqBOo+uHGsjM8m0Iz4tF4kEw22WAnqs61WhqkRePUzg+JjTAkKn3v Ewy4Ko7S9waSCFBScLFLkBB6/oEZMftqYOkQkxv15eQkyCt0X0PkC6Iapkn/nJPx ibtNokV/FvhUpknYb5T9rqfFKlQsqZqb24PhpsLrOAM6RAyi4gAqmP5bk3o9MqM= =JP7t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers