Hi Doug, I think it is OK that the newer version with appended v5-name to the library was uploaded. It should help to track the migration process.
Cheers Anton 2015-09-05 22:37 GMT+02:00 Doug Torrance <dtorra...@piedmont.edu>: > Hi Anton! > > I noticed that you set mathic to Done on the SoB page. This was > actually a new request, but I'm wondering if it was even necessary. > > A new RC bug [1] was filed against the version that you uploaded a > couple days ago. I imagine they just grepped the exported symbols, > saw that they included symbols that cause problems like the one that > made mathicgb FTBFS, and filed the bug. > > What they probably didn't realize was that we had already taken care > of it. However, I had neglected to append "v5" to the library name, > so I pushed a new version to git with the requested change. > > What do you think? Should we upload the new version, or leave it as > it is in unstable and close the bug by hand? > > Thanks! > Doug > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797983 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
