On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:09:44 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
>  - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>    maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
>    break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
>    against these packages.

There don't seem to be any rdeps.

smcv@coccia:~$ dak rm -R -n eclib
Will remove the following packages from unstable:

     eclib | 20150510-2 | source
eclib-tools | 20150510-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
 libec-dev | 20150510-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
    libec2 | 20150510-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x

Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 
<debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>

------------------- Reason -------------------

----------------------------------------------

Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Reply via email to