Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 00:41:10 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:48:34 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 18:34:35 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > [...] > > > As already said in the original bug report, please see the almost > > > identical bug #740463 for some further details about the SCOTCH > > > licensing issues. > > > > > > I hope this clarifies. > > > > > From what I understand CeCILL-C is intended to be more permissive than > > plain CeCILL, which itself is explicitly GPL-compatible. So not really. > > Regardless of what the license is *intended* to be, CeCILL-C in fact > includes restrictions not present in the GNU GPL and has no explicit > conversion-to-GPL clause, unlike the CeCILL license. > > As a consequence, CeCILL-C really appears to be GPL-incompatible, > unfortunately... > > > Anyway, thanks for following up on this bug report of mine. > And thanks for any help you may provide to fix the issue! > Since I disagree, I'd like you to get that confirmed in an authoritative statement from ftpmaster. In the meantime, I'll downgrade this bug. Cheers, Julien -- Julien Cristau <julien.cris...@logilab.fr> Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/ Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
