A quick poll on the Trilinos package naming: Right now, we have "libtrilinos", which triggers a package-name-doesnt-match-sonames warning since none of the Trilinos libraries is called libtrilinos.* (rather libepetra.*, libbelos.*, ...). This is similar to the libboost package which doesn't contain a library by the name libboost.* either. On the other hand, a software very similar to Trilinos, PETSc, goes by the Debian name "petsc". What would you prefer for a package name: libtrilinos or trilinos (with its -dev, -doc, -dbg variants, respectively)?
Cheers, Nico On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Anton Gladky <gl...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Nico, > > I have built locally your package. But if you run lintian over > .changes file, it gives a lot of errors and warnings. Please, > deal with them. > > Thanks > > > Anton > > > 2014-03-10 16:35 GMT+01:00 Nico Schlömer <nico.schloe...@gmail.com>: > >> > Did you repack it? >> >> Nope. For creating the printine-tar branch, I used the >> --git-pristine-tar option as described on >> https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit#pristine-tar. >> >> --Nico >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Anton Gladky <gl...@debian.org> wrote: >> > 2014-03-10 16:25 GMT+01:00 Nico Schlömer <nico.schloe...@gmail.com>: >> > >> >> > It seems, the checksum of tarball on the website and >> >> > in pristine-tar branch is not the same. >> >> >> >> So what to do about this? >> > >> > >> > Did you repack it? >> > >> > Anton >> > >> > >> > > > -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
