Perfect, now ompl compiles.
Thanks Steve A Dimecres, 12 de març de 2014, Jose Luis Rivero va escriure: > New boost release version (-5) was uploaded fixing the bug 739904 according > to the changelog[1]. > > [1] > http://metadata.ftp- master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/boost1.54/boost1.54_1.54.0-5_changelog > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <l...@alaxarxa.net > > wrote: > > > A Dimecres, 5 de març de 2014, Steve M. Robbins va escriure: > > > On March 3, 2014 09:22:01 AM Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > > > > > > [1] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8731 > > > > > [2] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84950 > > > > > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739904 > > > > > [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482372 > > > > > > > > Thanks Jose, > > > > > > > > so, when the new package of boost were upload, then we can try to build > > > > again and see if it works... I hope so. > > > > > > The fix for this bug has been made and uploaded. > > > > > > Unfortunately, the upload was rejected for unrelated bugs. Apparently > > they > > > are "serious" bugs but not the kind I am not motivated to fix. So > > patches > > for > > > #735339 and #735353 would be welcome. Please work against > > > svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-boost/boost/branches/1.54.0 > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I don't know if I'm surprised, thinking if it's Aprils fools or what. > > Simply I > > don't understand the situation. Anyway, looking the bugs: > > > > 735339:Non free w3m valid icons > > > > I think that it could be several solutions. One is repack the source > > without > > that file. I don't know how to send a patch for this. It's a NMU. Maybe, we > > can change the icon, but ... > > > > If it's just to change the icon, I can borrow the equivalent icons from > > piuparts and change it. > > > > And the last is create a libboost-nonfree with all this stuff. > > > > > > 735353: Sourceless file > > > > I have no idea about javascript. Looking the files the are scripts, some > > firstly I don't understand the bug. However, I imagine that this "strange > > files" come from some sources, and the file provided is just the exit from > > another script. > > > > I don't know sufficiently the policies but maybe it could be sufficient do: > > or put a note in the README with the two links from where download the > > sources, > > or include the two sources in some place of the package. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Leopold > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > > Linux User 152692 > > Catalonia > > > -- -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
