It's not as serious as it looks, and it's mostly the source files that are wrong, not d/copyright. See https://github.com/hfst/hfst/issues/494 for history - in 2021 I confirmed with upstream that the intended license is "3 or later", but not all files were changed to say so. I suppose I could do that, but that would have to wait for next upstream release.
The remaining minor issues are fixed in git https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/hfst/-/commit/09c9a9d2 so they'll be in next upload, which would be -3 as I already made a -2 to fix a piuparts issue. Also added a comment until upstream files are corrected. Would you prefer I upload -3, or can -2 be accepted and the rest wait for next release? -- Tino Didriksen On Wed, 29 Apr 2026 at 16:10, Mechtilde Stehmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > please list the files with the correct licenses. > > I randomly checked the list in the public notes and also saw the > differences. > > Thanks > > Further information may be found at: > https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/hfst > > Regards, Mechtilde Stehmann > Member of the DFSG, Licensing & New Packages Team > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. > >
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
