Dear Carles,
Thanks for the warning. From
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gfsview
it seems that the problem comes from:
uscan had problems while searching for a new upstream version:
In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage
http://gerris.dalembert.upmc.fr/gerris/tarballs/ failed: 500 Can't
connect to gerris.dalembert.upmc.fr:443 (certificate verify failed)
I checked and there is indeed a problem with the certificate.
I will fix it and tell you when it is done.
It would be good to have gfsview (and gfsview-batch) back in testing.
thanks for your help,
Stephane
On 4/26/26 22:49, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
Subject: gerris: recommends gfsview which is not in unstable
Package: gerris
Version: 20131206+dfsg-22
Usertags: package-relations package-relations-recommends
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainer(s),
I noticed that package gerris recommends gfsview, which is currently not
available in unstable.
See:
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gfsview
The source package "gfsview" has there binaries: gfsview-batch,
libgfsgl-dev and libgfsgl0t64.
Perhaps gerris should recommend gfsview-batch? Or perhaps it used to be
a package named "gfsview" that doesn't exist anymore.
Would it make sense to remove or update it?
Thank you for your time,
PS[0]: I am developing a tool to detect such issues:
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations . Reports are
manually reviewed before submission. If you would prefer not to receive
such reports (for specific packages, all of your maintained packages,
etc.), please let me know. Any other feedback is welcomed as well.
PS[1]: more information available in
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/README.md
and
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/docs/bug-report-extra-info.md
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
