Could you please extend that to armel?  Patch follows.

Hi. I personally don't like the strategy of having different values
for different architectures in cases like this one.

If we have to increase the timeout, let's do it for everybody.
If it needs to be double the current one, let's double it.

I would propose an alternative patch, but I don't know where exactly
the timeout is defined...

Thanks.

--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Reply via email to