Your message dated Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:00:06 +0530
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#962477: artha: Please migrate away from enchant(1) to 
enchant-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #962477,
regarding artha: Please migrate away from enchant(1) to enchant-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
962477: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962477
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: artha
Version: 1.0.3-3
Tags: sid  bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected] [email protected]

Dear Debian artha maintainers,

Current artha 1.0.3 in Debian still recommends libenchant1c2a as
optional dependency. This library is due to be removed in the Bulleye
cycle[1]. The new enchant-2 library will be replacing it.

Please consider working with artha upstream to add support of using
enchant-2 library.

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/956881

-- 
Regards,
Boyuan Yang

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Wed, 02 Sep 2020 20:32:19 -0400 Boyuan Yang <[email protected]> wrote:

> X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected] [email protected]
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Sundaram
<[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi BoyuanThanks for reporting this!
> > Artha 1.0.5, released today, the optional dependency of libenchant
has been
> bumped from 1 to 2.
> > Regards!Sundaram
>
> Thanks for providing this information. I see that there was a
artha/1.0.5-1
> upload but the recommendation to package libenchant1c2a was still in
the new
> version. Can we fix this problem soon (ideally before Debian 11 soft
freeze)?

Thanks a lot for your investigation on this, I've fixed this with the
next upload - hence closing the bug.
Do let me know if there's something else you'd like to be done for this
package.

Kind Regards,
Nilesh

--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Reply via email to