Hi, What should we do next here?
~ Kartik On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 12:56 AM Tino Didriksen <[email protected]> wrote: > I can answer that... > > The official stance of the Apertium project is that when one of our > repositories don't clarify the license beyond putting the GPL COPYING file in > the repo, then it should be interpreted as the "or any later" version of it > to maximize reusability. > > The data is often mixed with GPLv3 data at compile time, often by the same > authors, but where the GPLv2 stuff just predates wider GPLv3 adoption. > > E.g., see email > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06931.html > by Francis Tyers for reference. Both Francis Tyers and myself are on the > Apertium Project Management Committee ( http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC ). > > -- Tino Didriksen > > On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 20:00, Thorsten Alteholz > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Kartik, >> >> COPYING says that the license is GPL-2 only. >> Please add a note in your debian/copyright why it should be GPL-2+. >> >> Thanks! >> Thorsten -- Kartik Mistry | કાર્તિક મિસ્ત્રી kartikm.wordpress.com -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
