Konstantin Matyukhin -> list @ Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:40:03 +0200: > Ох, извини. Я все перепутал. В stretch пришлось патчить. В jessie как раз > все работает.
Не получается... Я сейчас покажу конфиги и чуть-чуть логи, вдруг понятно, что не так? На самом деле уверенности в том, что на том конце ожидают именно этого, нет. Винда работает, но что там себе думает винда... sensitive parts replaced, разумеется. /etc/ipsec.conf, по документации от StrongSwan: config setup conn krys fragmentation=yes dpdaction=restart keyexchange=ikev1 type=transport right=x.y.z.t rightsubnet=%dynamic[/1701] leftauth=psk rightauth=psk auto=add /etc/ipsec.secrets: x.y.z.t : PSK "********" Тут интересно, что конструкция не видит PSK, приписанную к имени хоста, если имя в адрес резолвится, а обратно, нет. Некоторое время долбился об это. После ipsec start в логе Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[DMN] Starting IKE charon daemon (strongSwan 5.2.1, Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64, x86_64) Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[CFG] loading ca certificates from '/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts' Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[CFG] loading aa certificates from '/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts' Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[CFG] loading ocsp signer certificates from '/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts' Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[CFG] loading attribute certificates from '/etc/ipsec.d/acerts' Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[CFG] loading crls from '/etc/ipsec.d/crls' Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[CFG] loading secrets from '/etc/ipsec.secrets' Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[CFG] loaded IKE secret for x.y.z.t Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[LIB] loaded plugins: charon aes rc2 sha1 sha2 md5 random nonce x509 revocation const raints pubkey pkcs1 pkcs7 pkcs8 pkcs12 pgp dnskey sshkey pem openssl fips-prf gmp agent xcbc hmac gcm attr kernel-netlink resolve socket-default stroke updown Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[LIB] unable to load 3 plugin features (3 due to unmet dependencies) Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[LIB] dropped capabilities, running as uid 0, gid 0 Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 00[JOB] spawning 16 worker threads Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 16[CFG] received stroke: add connection 'krys' Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 16[CFG] left nor right host is our side, assuming left=local Aug 29 20:02:05 silver charon: 16[CFG] added configuration 'krys' С виду вроде нормально. После ipsec up krys в терминале initiating Main Mode IKE_SA krys[1] to x.y.z.t generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[500] to x.y.z.t[500] (272 bytes) received packet: from x.y.z.t[500] to 192.168.4.13[500] (124 bytes) parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V ] received DPD vendor ID received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[500] to x.y.z.t[500] (372 bytes) received packet: from x.y.z.t[500] to 192.168.4.13[500] (356 bytes) parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ] local host is behind NAT, sending keep alives generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH ] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[4500] to x.y.z.t[4500] (76 bytes) received packet: from x.y.z.t[4500] to 192.168.4.13[4500] (92 bytes) parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ] IKE_SA krys[1] established between 192.168.4.13[192.168.4.13]...x.y.z.t[x.y.z.t] scheduling reauthentication in 10161s maximum IKE_SA lifetime 10701s generating QUICK_MODE request 2738774603 [ HASH SA No ID ID NAT-OA NAT-OA ] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[4500] to x.y.z.t[4500] (252 bytes) received packet: from x.y.z.t[4500] to 192.168.4.13[4500] (156 bytes) parsed QUICK_MODE response 2738774603 [ HASH SA No ID ID ] CHILD_SA krys{1} established with SPIs c7e58289_i 7ae4a942_o and TS 192.168.4.13/32 === x.y.z.t/32[l2f] connection 'krys' established successfully в логе Aug 29 20:02:16 silver charon: 11[CFG] received stroke: initiate 'krys' Aug 29 20:02:16 silver charon: 13[IKE] initiating Main Mode IKE_SA krys[1] to x.y.z.t Aug 29 20:02:16 silver charon: 13[ENC] generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ] Aug 29 20:02:16 silver charon: 13[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[500] to x.y.z.t[500] (272 bytes) Aug 29 20:02:16 silver charon: 08[NET] received packet: from x.y.z.t[500] to 192.168.4.13[500] (124 bytes) Aug 29 20:02:16 silver charon: 08[ENC] parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V ] Aug 29 20:02:16 silver charon: 08[IKE] received DPD vendor ID Aug 29 20:02:16 silver charon: 08[IKE] received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID Aug 29 20:02:16 silver charon: 08[ENC] generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ] Aug 29 20:02:16 silver charon: 08[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[500] to x.y.z.t[500] (372 bytes) Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 14[NET] received packet: from x.y.z.t[500] to 192.168.4.13[500] (356 bytes) Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 14[ENC] parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ] Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 14[IKE] local host is behind NAT, sending keep alives Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 14[ENC] generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH ] Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 14[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[4500] to x.y.z.t[4500] (76 bytes) Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 01[NET] received packet: from x.y.z.t[4500] to 192.168.4.13[4500] (92 bytes) Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 01[ENC] parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ] Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 01[IKE] IKE_SA krys[1] established between 192.168.4.13[192.168.4.13]...x.y.z.t[x.y.z.t] Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 01[IKE] scheduling reauthentication in 10161s Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 01[IKE] maximum IKE_SA lifetime 10701s Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 01[ENC] generating QUICK_MODE request 2738774603 [ HASH SA No ID ID NAT-OA NAT-OA ] Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 01[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[4500] to x.y.z.t[4500] (252 bytes) Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 15[NET] received packet: from x.y.z.t[4500] to 192.168.4.13[4500] (156 bytes) Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 15[ENC] parsed QUICK_MODE response 2738774603 [ HASH SA No ID ID ] Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 15[IKE] CHILD_SA krys{1} established with SPIs c7e58289_i 7ae4a942_o and TS 192.168.4.13/32 === x.y.z.t/32[l2f] Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 15[ENC] generating QUICK_MODE request 2738774603 [ HASH ] Aug 29 20:02:17 silver charon: 15[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[4500] to x.y.z.t[4500] (60 bytes) А вот дальше странно: Aug 29 20:02:41 silver charon: 13[IKE] sending keep alive to x.y.z.t[4500] Aug 29 20:02:47 silver charon: 08[IKE] sending DPD request Aug 29 20:02:47 silver charon: 08[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2751735170 [ HASH N(DPD) ] Aug 29 20:02:47 silver charon: 08[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[4500] to x.y.z.t[4500] (92 bytes) Aug 29 20:03:07 silver charon: 01[IKE] sending keep alive to x.y.z.t[4500] Aug 29 20:03:17 silver charon: 11[IKE] sending DPD request Aug 29 20:03:17 silver charon: 11[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 4036527951 [ HASH N(DPD) ] Aug 29 20:03:17 silver charon: 11[NET] sending packet: from 192.168.4.13[4500] to x.y.z.t[4500] (92 bytes) и так по циклу. Смущает, что ничего не received. /etc/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.conf: [lac krysl2tp] lns = x.y.z.t refuse chap = yes refuse pap = yes require authentication = yes ppp debug = yes pppoptfile = /etc/ppp/peers/krysl2tp length bit = yes Вот по xl2tpd документации не нашел. Вообще. Строил по примерам, что есть в /usr/share/doc/xl2tpd. /etc/ppp/peers/krysl2tp: name some_login remotename remote ipparam remote ipcp-accept-local ipcp-accept-remote noccp noauth crtscts idle 1800 mtu 1410 mru 1410 nodefaultroute debug lock proxyarp connect-delay 5000 /etc/ppp/chap-secrets: some_login * some_password * После bash -c 'echo "c krysl2tp" > /run/xl2tpd/l2tp-control' в логе Aug 29 20:04:34 silver xl2tpd[4028]: Connecting to host x.y.z.t, port 1701 Aug 29 20:04:39 silver xl2tpd[4028]: Maximum retries exceeded for tunnel 6825. Closing. Aug 29 20:04:39 silver xl2tpd[4028]: Connection 0 closed to x.y.z.t, port 1701 (Timeout) Aug 29 20:04:44 silver xl2tpd[4028]: Unable to deliver closing message for tunnel 6825. Destroying anyway. Судя по тому, что я вижу, до pppd дело не доходит. Ругань вываливается быстро, т.е. с того конца, видимо, не глухо, а refused. Хотелось бы разобраться, что за фигня, но читать протокольные пакеты глазами, особенно если они шифруются, ресурса нет. Может, я тупо что-то известное не вписал или вписал не так?