Hello Sattaroff,
Monday, January 15, 2001, 10:07:20 AM, you wrote:
ST> On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Denis Danilov wrote:
ST> а что выдает утилита findsuper ?
Вот результат работы "findsuper /dev/hda2":
thisoff block fs_blk_sz blksz grp last_mount
10928640 10672 -1677881218 -551876163 16078 Tue Mar 11 12:12:56 1969
134217728 131072 343728 2 1 Fri Jan 12 16:55:47 2001
235646976 230124 -1003597070 -14052998 13274 Fri Feb 13 08:41:05 1959
362025984 353541 -112491288 85628426 16647 Wed Mar 10 14:06:58 1971
402653184 393216 343728 2 3 Fri Jan 12 16:55:47 2001
412934656 403256 1024 -1779935664 4292 Tue Jan 23 13:37:52 2007
525711360 513390 -1840262033 816883619 54276 Sat Jan 28 23:08:32 1950
599773696 585716 -737651068 -1888955317 5547 Wed May 18 03:56:32 1932
649771008 634542 -1455439250 1360277483 46009 Fri Nov 29 12:21:18 1907
671088640 655360 343728 2 5 Fri Jan 12 16:55:47 2001
793088000 774500 1401696666 -856510519 26021 Fri Feb 3 15:56:23 1978
922139648 900527 748171195 -149438057 30691 Tue Oct 17 12:21:18 1939
937316352 915348 1401696666 -856510519 26021 Fri Feb 3 15:56:23 1978
939524096 917504 343728 2 7 Fri Jan 12 16:55:47 2001
1207959552 1179648 343728 2 9 Fri Jan 12 16:55:47 2001
1296584704 1266196 2031773589 -1160979852 37451 Tue Mar 2 06:02:31 1915
1315307520 1284480 317520 2 9 Thu Nov 30 13:33:43 2000
Failed on 1 at 1407909888
Что можно сказать, используя эту информацию?
далее пробовал
# e2fsck -b 131072 /dev/hda2
e2fsck 1.18, 11-Nov-1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/hda2
The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2
filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2
filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
# e2fsck -b 393216 /dev/hda2
e2fsck 1.18, 11-Nov-1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
e2fsck: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read while
trying to open /dev/hda2
Could this be a zero-length partition?
--
Best regards,
Denis mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
