On 2020, ഏപ്രിൽ 5 7:44:03 PM IST, Utkarsh Gupta <utka...@debian.org> wrote:
>Hi Praveen,
>
>On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:19 AM Pirate Praveen
><prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
>> It'd be better to share the reverse dependencies that fail to give a
>better idea of the impact.
>
>ruby-twitter and ruby-webmock fail. But I'll take care of them myself
>before the upload of ruby-http.
>
>About ruby-twitter,
>Recently, ruby-twitter's upstream rolled out a new release 7.0.0
>(after 6.2.0 -- which is in the archive).
>This release fixes a bunch of stuff, warnings, et al. I did the update
>locally and everything went fine.
>However, diaspora and rabbiter are the only rev-deps. Out of which,
>diaspora will break.
>But given diaspora is already broken in unstable, will it be okay to
>upload ruby-twitter 7.0.0 to unstable?
>Or should it go via experimental (if you want?) or something?
Diaspora is broken at the moment, so don't consider it a blocker. Just check
rabbiter only.
>
>Best,
>Utkarsh
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
