Hi,
Oh, sorry.
I already uploaded pry into unstable.
Best,
Youhei
On April 2, 2020 5:33:56 PM Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
On 2020, ഏപ്രിൽ 2 12:43:32 PM IST, Youhei SASAKI <uwab...@gfd-dennou.org>
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:24:11 +0900,
Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
On 2020, ഏപ്രിൽ 2 6:46:51 AM IST, Youhei SASAKI
<uwab...@gfd-dennou.org> wrote:
>
>I'll upload pry 0.13.0 into unstable.
>Thanks for your commit.
Did you also fix the two broken packages mentioned by Daniel ?
I think no need to be special care.
All these should be uploaded at the same time.
- ruby-gurad: Fixed upstream
https://github.com/guard/guard/issues/953
and already released new upstream v2.16.2. Need upgrade usuall way.
- ruby-pry-byebug:
As I checked, ruby-pry-byebug v3.9.0 seems fine with pry 0.13.0.
Current ruby-pry-byebug in unstable is bit old (v3.7.0), Need upgarde
usuall way. But tihs package is under different team umbrella
(Freexian Packaging Team).
Best,
Youhei
>On April 2, 2020 9:48:52 AM Daniel Leidert <dleid...@debian.org>
wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> pry currently fails to build in unstable because
ruby-method-source
>was updated
>> recently to version 1.0. pry 0.13.0 supports this version and
builds
>fine now.
>> However it breaks ruby-guard (<< 2.16.2) and ruby-pry-byebug (<<
>3.9.0). The
>> other reverse dependencies build and/or test fine. The mentioned
>versions have
>> been released with support for pry 0.13 and could therefor be
>uploaded. However
>> I have no idea if they could break more things. So should pry 0.13
go
>to
>> experimental now? Or shall we dicuss this on Friday?
>>
>> Regards, Daniel
--
Youhei SASAKI <uwab...@gfd-dennou.org>
<uwab...@debian.or.jp>
GPG fingerprint:
4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
