Hi, On 20-02-12 00:29:55, Daniel Leidert wrote: > can we file RM requests for coquelicot and its reverse dependencies > like ruby- haml-magic-translations? Both are dead upstream and have RC > bugs. ruby-haml- magic-translations further (build-)depends on a > non-available ruby-haml version and is not trivial to fix to work with > ruby-haml 5 (I just tried; or maybe it's just the tests which need > fixing?). So IMHO if we keep these packages we actually become the new > upstream for these packages. coquelicot has just two installations > according to popcon. > > Can we agree on filing RM requests?
Not yet please -- I would like to check with some people before doing so. I'll keep you posted, cheers, Georg
