On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 09:43:56PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 07.01.2020, 11:35 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 04:23:21AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > Hi Antonio, > > > > > > Am Montag, den 06.01.2020, 22:17 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: > > > > > > [..] > > > > FWIW I uploaded gem2deb 1.0.1 earlier today fixing the issue. > > > > > > Thanks for your quick response. > > > > > > Unfortunately there is still an issue. gem2deb-test-runner requires > > > gem2deb/package_name_mapping but does not depend on gem2deb. Therefor > > > autopkgtest fails on salsa.d.o (line 2306f): > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/jekyll/-/jobs/495551#L2306 > > > > > > Regards, Daniel > > > > argh. I made yet another upload to fix this. > > I'm sorry to bother you again: debci logs show that gem2deb-test-runner exits > with code 77: > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/r/ruby-jekyll-mentions/3918799/log.gz > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/r/ruby-jekyll-archives/3919057/log.gz > > and fails the test. Is there a reason why it exits with this code when there > is > no test suite? The packages mentioned don't ship test files. It seems that > these are also the regressions mentioned at > https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gem2deb.html preventing it from migration to > testing.
That was another mistake of mine. gem2deb 1.0 should be released after autodep8 0.22, and I failed to do that. I requested a retry of all of those testes. Thanks for letting me know.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
