Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-08-14 19:08:47) > Hi ruby and js teams, > > task_list project [1] provides both ruby and nodejs code from the same > repo. Currently only ruby-task-list binary package is created. I added > a new binary package node-deckar01-task-list for the nodejs code, but > it was rejected by ftp masters [2].
Did you quote ftpmaster in full in that referenced post written by you? > They think we should not add a new binary package for this case and > instead should use a Provides field and a single binary package. Do they? In what you reference above I only see Ftpmaster saying "We've talked about this." which can frankly mean a lot of different things. > I don't agree with their decision, but the only option I have to > challenege it is a GR. You mean you have already tried the route of going to the technical committee, and asking for the opinion of the DPL? Or am I missing something making those options a no-go? Whichever options available, I think it would be helpful with the opinions of stakeholders more clearly laid out - i.e. more than quoting ftpmasters for saying "We've talked about this." and you taking responsibility for explaining what that's supposed to mean. Thanks for your work on this, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
