On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 10:03:10PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On 12/27/18 12:30 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Or if someone wants to move ahead with rails 5 without waiting for > > gitlab, please let me know (gitlab is not going to be in buster anyway, > > hopefully we will find another way to provide gitlab in buster, at the > > minimum in my personal repo). > > > > Can anyone confirm if the transition freeze applies to rails as well? > We manage it inside the team and not involve the release team for an > official transition I guess. (almost?) All affected packages are managed > by the same team.
Yes. Even though we would be able to "hide" this from the RT because it's not handled as a "proper" transition, you are still making changes that have a large potential for breakage, regardless of who maintains the affected packages. So, the time to go for rails 5 for buster is *now*.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature