On 4/25/16, Dmitry Smirnov <[email protected]> wrote: >> 1) upstream is not merged to master > > Intentional. See gbp.conf.
Okay, but it's not a layout used by ruby-pkg-extras team afaik. >> 2) as ghi is an application not a library I consider to rename the >> package to just ghi > > Sorry, I don't quite follow you... There are two binary packages: "ruby-ghi" > and "ghi". The latter installs executable binary. "ruby-ghi" is its library > that may or may not be used by others. > You suggest to merge "ruby-ghi" into "ghi", right? If ghi is the only consumer of ruby-ghi then I don't see any reason to introduce a new package. So I suggest to merge.
