On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:56 AM Per Andersson <avtob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Michael Crusoe > <michael.cru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > FYI, ruby-pathname2 1.7.4-1 > > Doesn't build cleanly in a chroot > > * test/test_pathname.rb: test_realpath_platform: /dev/stdin does > not evaluate to ['/dev/pts/0', '/dev/proc/self/fd/0'] as realpath. > When I build the realpath is only /dev/fd/pipe ... > Right, the author wasn't expecting the tests to be run in an environment where a pipe is connected to /dev/stdin. I've commented the test out via a patch and sent the issue upstream. https://github.com/djberg96/pathname2/issues/2 > Packaging is solid otherwise. Although, I suggest you ship the > example also (list the examples dir in > debian/ruby-pathname2.examples). > Neat, I didn't know about `dh_installexamples` before. This is done. > > > > ruby-threach 0.2.0-1 are also ready for review > > & upload. > > There are no tests but looks ready for upload otherwise. > Since there are no tests I would like to see some examples > of it actually working before uploading. Something I can > reproduce myself! > Yeah, no tests make me sad. I'm not a ruby dev, otherwise I'd try writing one myself. ruby-crb-blast and transrate both have extensive tests and they pass with this package.
