* Cédric Boutillier <bou...@debian.org> [150628 08:47]: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:12:45AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > Can you please read the message below and let me know what you think? > > Hi, > > After having followed for a couple of years the Ruby BoF thanks to the > video streaming, I will attend to the event in person this year, so I am > maybe a bit biased. > > If the Ruby BoF keeps the same format as last year, i.e. a discussion > about various topics, then it doesn't make sense to convert it to a > talk (or split it into two subevents). > > Video coverage for BoF in my opinion is good for people who are > following live the event, with video streaming and interact via IRC. > Afterwards, reading a written report is often more useful (you get the > same amount information in less time).
I concur; from my PoV last years version (basic meeting with live video and IRC interaction) worked quite well. More or less we're using this as a big videochat room, the recording won't be very useful. C. -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `-
pgpESdb2Ibex9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
