Hi, At Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:11:02 +0200, Cédric Boutillier <bou...@debian.org> wrote: > > But lintian said that: > > W: ruby-fastimage source: missing-runtime-tests-field tests > > P: ruby-fastimage source: unknown-runtime-tests-field test-command > > > How to handle above mentions? Is this a linitan matter? > > It is just because lintian is lagging a bit in comparision > with the debian/tests/control syntax.
Ok. I'll ignore these messages. > > > - instead of using a patch to import the image from the upstream > > > Git repository, maybe you can use a tarball created from tagged > > > commits on Github: > > > https://github.com/sdsykes/fastimage/releases > > > That would avoid the trouble of carrying around binary diffs. > > > Hmm... > > > Unfortunately, upstream forgot create release tag in github repo. > > Github release tag: v1.6.0 > > RubyGem release: v1.6.3 > > > I already sent request to upstream about missing fixtures. But, if we > > have to avoid to use binary diff, I'll create package using github > > sources with version number, e.g., 1.6.3~gitYYYYMMDD-1. > > That would probably be the way to go, then. In the mean time, can you > open an issue upstream to tag 1.6.3 on the Git repo? Maybe it will be > solved more quickly than the inclusion of the picture in the gem. It's resonable. I'll do that. Best wishes, Youhei --- Youhei SASAKI <uwab...@gfd-dennou.org> <uwab...@debian.or.jp> GPG fingerprint: 4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/877g1t7yjg.wl-uwab...@gfd-dennou.org
