Hi, On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:31:13PM -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: > Hi all,
> I want to get an opinion about RSpec::Support.[1] The main RSpec gems
> (ruby-rspec-{core,expectations,mocks}) have become quite dependent on this
> module.
> The description is:
> RSpec::Support provides common functionality to RSpec::Core,
> RSpec::Expectations and RSpec::Mocks. It is considered suitable for internal
> use only at this time.
> I would like an opinion as to whether it is appropriate to create
> ruby-rspec-support with a warning in the description, as opposed to lots of
> patches in the other 3 packages.
On this list a couple of months ago, Miguel Landaeta started a thread
about rspec 3.0.
https://lists.debian.org/20140422192002.ga9...@alice.nomadium.lan
The concensus was, IIRC, that jessie would ship rspec-* 2.x, and we could
prepare a new ruby-rspec package for the 3.x version (one source package
for all modules) in experimental and play with it before the next
development cycle.
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
