On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 13:50, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 13:48, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > > * Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> [140624 13:44]: > > > now that rails 4.1 is out we need to decide what to do with RoR in > > > Debian. > > > > > > >From past experience I would suggest to push very strong to have latest > > > available version before freeze. > > > > > > It would be better to don't have any reverse dependencies (like redmine) > > > in next Debian stable than to cope with outdated not-supported version > > > in stable like we do have now. We could always provide missing r-deps > > > via backports and we would still end up in better situation than > > > current. > > > > If we're not going to ship any app that needs rails, I don't see a > > point of shipping rails at all. > > Ack. > > If we are not able to ship a version of rails that will be supported for > the lifetime of stable release we should not ship any rails at all.
And I have started the process to fix the current situation. src:rails with 4.1 packaged has been uploaded to experimental RC bug against rails-3.2 has been filled (#754969) RC bug against rails-4.0 has been filled (#754983) Removal bug against rails-4.0 has been filled (#754980) Testing removal bug against rails-3.2 has been filled (#754981) Cheers, -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1405523479.2163.142322473.49beb...@webmail.messagingengine.com
