Dear Harlan, At Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:11:55 +0200, Dominique Dumont <d...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Saturday 31 May 2014 16:08:31 Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote: > > If I had to pick one, I think I'd probably go with #3, in the desperate > > hopes that the two "plugins" can simply be fixed at whatever version > > they are at the time of the main jekyll update and that we won't run > > into problems needing an update of one of them between jekyll updates. > > But, I'm not the maintainer, so I'm happy to do it however you guys and > > gals would like. > > Given that Debian contributor (*) time is limited, I'd shoot for the > solution that limit the work on contributor's time (provided users are > not impacted), i.e. solution #1: create a package per gem. (like > ruby-jekyll-test-plugin)
+1 I'll create some new packages ASAP. > > If you'd like to look at my work so far, I've put it up at > > https://github.com/hlieberman/debian-jekyll. Thanks for your work. I merge your work in our pkg-ruby-extras/jekyll repos. If you can, please push our repos directly. > You could also push your work on a new branch on pkg-ruby-extras/jekyll repo. > This would avoid reviewers to add a remote to their git repo. Best wishes, Youhei --- Youhei SASAKI <uwab...@gfd-dennou.org> <uwab...@debian.or.jp> GPG fingerprint: 4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87lhtfgmgy.wl%uwab...@gfd-dennou.org
