On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Daniel Martí <mv...@mvdan.cc> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 20:33:09 +0100, Daniel Martí wrote: > >> We use patched libraries because we need some fixes and improvements over >> native one. > > I asked whether he tried merging those changes into their respective > upstream repositories. > >> I can build a gems like `gitlab-grit` or something if it saves you a lot of >> efforts. > > Would this be a valid workaround? AFAIK the gems would not conflict with > the original ones. It wouldn't be the cleanest of the solutions, but it > might just work (if the "merge the changes into the gems" option is not > possible).
What are the changes that are incompatible with original upstream? I suppose I would rather patch gitlab to use vanilla grit, if possible. -- Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CABYrXSRj-82T=r70bsj1qk0wgnbyk9n35qam5p+nyay3auh...@mail.gmail.com
