On 17/04/11 at 16:04 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Hi everyone ! > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Lucas Nussbaum > <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote: > > In case you didn't notice, we are now ready for a mass-migration to > > gem2deb. > > Great ! > > > There are two pages to help you: > > - http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/wheezy/ > > (and http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/wheezy/details.html) > > This is the current status of the transition, updated daily. > > > > - http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyInWheezy > > This is supposed to document everything. As it's a wiki page, don't > > hesitate to contribute to improving it. > > I'm ready to join the fun in, but there still something which isn't > clear to me at this point: what is the status about "switching to git" > ? I personally am happy with svn-buildpackage ;-)... Is there a real > problem with performing the transition on the SVN repository -- or on > new git repositories for those who wish to migrate their packages ? > > That said, if the consensus is on using git, I won't object, I just > think we'd spend time migrating the packages to gem2deb rather than to > git ;-)...
Yes, I think that the consensus is also that we should switch to git (even for existing packages). With the mr-based workflow, it's not more difficult to work with it than with svn. > Should one add the migrated packages to the .mrconfig file ? Yes, even if it's not absolulely necessary to do it every time you add a package, since there's a 'make-mrconfig' script that does the right thing. Please update the doc if you feel this needs clarification. - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110417152131.ga5...@xanadu.blop.info