On 30/03/11 at 11:39 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > On 28/03/11 at 12:22 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > > > I've uploaded a new version of gem2deb with the current git version, > > > > this time to unstable. > > > > Before that, I also made a change to allow to build only for specific > > > > ruby versions. I haven't added any tests, it would be great if someone > > > > could review the code and add some tests. > > > > > > Writing a test suite will probably induce some refactoring, but the > > > semantics look good. > > > > > > > I'm now going to push ruby1.8 / ruby-defaults / ruby1.9.1 to unstable. > > > > > > > > After that, I think that we could try to package a dozen of libs with > > > > gem2deb, and upload them to unstable, to get a better idea of what is > > > > still missing. > > > > > > Maybe we could start with gem2deb's own build dependencies. I will > > > update shoulda and mocha when I have some time. > > > > OK. > > > > i've created a package to track the transition status: > > http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ruby-transition.cgi > > Great! > > I went a little further and prepared a visual representation of the work > we have ahead of us: > > http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/wheezy/
Nice! On my side, I've: - fixed an important bug in gem2deb: we need to test extensions after building them for each ruby version. We were testing all extensions with the last one to be built. - Added a gen-ruby-trans-pkgs script that generates the debian/control snippet needed to add transitional packages. (both fixed in gem2deb 0.2.1, uploaded and accepted) - updated and uploaded ruby-json and ruby-termios (both in NEW). No other problem encountered. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
