Hi, I'm very sorry for my late response. At Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:09:02 -0300, Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]> wrote: > > As I understand from bluefeather's documentation, it is also supposed to > be as a library by Ruby programs, right? In that case, that library > should be in a binary package called libbluefeather-ruby* to be > consistent with all the other libraries ...
I have some question, from "Ruby In Wheezy" at DebianWiki. It seems that the correct way is: bluefeather: cui tool, depends ruby-bluefeather ruby-bluefeather: Pure Ruby library and Documents Is it right ? > Speaking of that, why didn't that features and bug fixes done in > BlueCloth itself instead of creating a new package? Would that be > possible? Do we need yet another markdown library for Ruby, since we > already have RedCloth, BlueCloth, and maybe others? For the first, I do not know well. But upstream author(Dice) would have to report the bug and he would have done it already. For the seconds, BlueFeather is converter for Markdown *Extra*, not plain Markdown. Markdown Extra support many additional syntax, e.g. Tables, Definition Lists, Footnote. RedCloth is converter for textile, and does not support Markdown from version 4. BlueCloth is support *pure* Markdown syntax only. This library is very fast but not support Markdown Extra. > The debian/repack.sh script did not put the repacked tarball in the same > directory as the downloaded .zip. Is that expected? I am worried of this. I didn't set target directory as you mentioned. Should I set target directory for "../tarballs"? However, should I use git-buildpackage, this problem will be fixed because git-buildpackage have upstream branch. # I prefer git-buildpcakge rather than svn-buildpackage... > The package description mentions a pair of command line tools, but the > package only contains one program in /usr/bin. I think, It is miss spelling. "pair of command line tool and libraries". Bluefeather provides one command line tool, /usr/bin/bluefeather, and some libraries. I'll fix it and contact upstream author. > Your debian/copyright file does not seem correct. The upstream package > does not have an explicit copyright message in a README, and > lib/bluefeather.rb lists the following: I'll request upstream author to put copyright notice. Then, I'll fix debian/copyright too. Sincerely Yours, --- Youhei SASAKI <[email protected]> <[email protected]> GPG fingerprint: 4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y63w25lu.wl%[email protected]
