On 05/03/11 at 16:01 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > OK, but then we have a problem: gem2deb currently generates source > > packages named like the gem. This might be OK as a default, but I think > > that we should have an option to switch to ruby-* source naming. > > Anyone willing to make the changes? > > Actually it generates source packages with the same as the gem, and > binary packages named like ruby-* by default. > > I've fixed that and sent you a pull request: > https://github.com/ln/gem2deb/pull/13
Thanks, merged! > > In the meantime, I will make a first upload of the gem2deb package to > > Debian experimental. The other changes (installation of gemspec ; ruby-* > > source name) can wait for the next upload. > > > > I'll post the link of the wiki page to -devel@ shortly, too. > > > > I think that the plan could be: > > - upload gem2deb to experimental > > - upload updated interpreter packages to experimental > > - update a dozen of libs to use gem2deb, upload to experimental > > If everything is fine at this point, move everything to unstable. > > > > Comments? > > Just one thing: since there is no previous version of gem2deb in > unstable, I don't see the point of uploading it to experimental first. True. However, it's also a way to say that it should not be used by everybody yet. I'm also working on updated ruby1.8, ruby1.9.1, ruby-defaults and libgems-ruby packages, that I will upload to experimental too. - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
