Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I think that packages installed by hand go to
/usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8, at least when installed with setup.rb. It
would be really wrong if packages installed by hand would go somewhere
under /usr/lib/.
In my mind, site_ruby is for libs and programs installed by hand. That's
why /usr/lib/ruby/1.8 for packaged libs and /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8
for libs installed by hand is OK to me. What does site_ruby means BTW ?
To me "site_ruby" means something like "local_ruby" (like in "on site").
I would like to emphasize that the affected Debian packages are the ones
of the third-party libs and programs. If you are to update all the
packages, it's better to have strong arguments for this change. Can you
sum up why people complain about that ? Are there real benefits ?
Mathieu Blondel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
