On 14518 March 1977, Josh Triplett wrote: >> (my first thought was a canonical online location, but these tools may >> not want that at runtime and can't rely on it at build time, but maybe >> that should be the source used for the package) > Packaging this data (section names, short descriptions, and long > descriptions) seems like a great idea. Ideally, packages would have a > Depends on this and use the data at runtime, rather than using a > Build-Depends and compiling it in. With some care, such a package could > also serve as the basis for the descriptions on packages.debian.org.
Does it need a package? Or just a file in the archive somewhere? -- bye, Joerg
