On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:46:58 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 07:24:00AM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Mike Hommey: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Why has nspr been a valid candidate for testing migration for several > > > weeks or months without it happening? > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > Hi Mike, > > > > Britney believes migrating nspr will break libnspr4-0d in testing. > > Which is technically true as libsnpr4-0d has a strictly equal dependency > > on libsnpr4. Normally she should remove libnspr4-0d as she migrates > > nspr to testing, but for some reason she doesn't in this case. > > > > It wasn't entirely obvious to me in the 5 minutes I had time to debug > > it. AFAICT, nothing depends on libsnpr4-0d in testing, so at first > > glance, she should just throw it out. > > Who should I bug for something to happen, presumably manually since it's > not happening automatically? ftp-masters? > I've forced migration a few days ago. I guess you could file a bug against release.d.o with the britney usertag to record this and hopefully it'll get looked at, but in the mean time the immediate problem should be gone.
Cheers, Julien