Hi, On 18/11/16 13:47, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 11/18/2016 11:05 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >> [Rene Engelhard, 2016-11-18] >>>> [...] >>>> To sum up: it's IMO really too late for such an upload, and it shouldn't >>>> be allowed, unless we don't care about OpenStack in Debian. >>> >>> Yup. Transition freeze was ~2 weeks ago, and this wasn't approved, so I've >>> no idea why this should be allowed... >> >> that's because: >> a) I consider SQLAlchemy new upstream releases stable now, so I dropped >> the << dependency in latest upload >> b) I wanted to upload it over a month ago. The << 1.1 dependency is >> mostly in OpenStack packages so I contacted Thomas back then. He >> asked me to wait 1 or 2 weeks because he's busy. > > Piotr, > > I urge you to stop distorting reality. I've told you I needed 2 weeks to > check if that would work, and the result is: it does *NOT*. SQLA 1.1 > breaks at least Cinder, Barbican and SQLA-Migrate at build time, and for > sure even more at runtime. > >> I agreed to upload to >> experimental for now so that he can do tests and asked him to not complain >> later about library transition freeze (sic!). He didn't report back any >> problems except SQLAlchemy Migrate (about which he wanted to talk >> with SQLAlchemy's upstream author during OpenStack conference IIRC). > > This is *NOT* true. This document has been made a few days after you > asked me to test: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sqla-1.1-transition > > This clearly shows trace dumps for Migrate, Cinder, and Barbican.
Piotr, any comment on that? I see in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841339#10 you didn't want to break openstack, so it'd be good to get that fixed or revert this change. Thanks, Emilio
