On 05/10/16 00:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 04/10/16 19:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Le 04/10/2016 à 19:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : >>> Hi Sylvestre, >>> >>> On 22/07/16 11:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>> On 22/07/16 11:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>>> Severity: normal >>>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >>>>> Usertags: transition >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM. >>>>> This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition: >>>>> * takes too much time >>>>> * 3.8 is stable with its 3.8.1 release >>>>> * 3.7 is no longer maintained >>>>> * we have too many releases of llvm in the archive >>>>> * I don't remember seeing critical changes between 3.7 and 3.8 >>>> >>>> Yes please! But first the build problems need to be fixed: >>>> >>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8&suite=sid >>> >>> Everything got fixed except for armel, which didn't receive any reply to the >>> call for help in #820535. So I think we can proceed without llvm 3.8 on >>> armel. >>> Some packages may need to drop support there or just get removed on armel. >>> Packages are already moving to llvm 3.8 anyway. >>> >>> So I'd say go ahead and update the llvm-defaults package for 3.8. Let me >>> know >>> when that happens so I can schedule binNMUs. >> Done! > > clamav freemat gnome-builder and libclang-perl binNMUed.
clamav and freemat fail to build against LLVM 3.8. They have bug reports. Emilio
