On 20.09.2016 23:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 09/20/2016 11:16 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> - powerpc: No porter (RM blocker) > > I'd be happy to pick up powerpc to keep it for Stretch. I'm already > maintaining powerpcspe which is very similar to powerpc.
No, you are not maintaining powerpcspe as a release architecture, and that's something different than building packages for some of the ports architectures. If you can get powerpcspe accepted as a release architecture, then maybe you gain some credibility to maintain another release architecture ;) Matthias
