On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:44:42PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Kurt Roeckx 2016-06-11 <20160611194259.ga6...@roeckx.be> > > > > If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this > > > > transition? Are there things you want me to do? > > > > > > Please upload to experimental first and let us know when that's happened. > > > > It's in experimental already. The test suite only fails > > on hurd, for some reason it's not finding the engine. I still > > need to look at that. > > Hi, > > do you expect the transition to be done for stretch?
I really would like to have it in stretch. I don't want to have the same situtation like we had with 1.0.2 that didn't make it it to jessie. > I'm asking because the PostgreSQL people want to know if they need to > add support for OpenSSL 1.1 in the older release branches (9.2 .. > 9.4), or if patching 9.5 .. 10 is enough for now. I guess they want to provide binaries for all their releases on apt.postgresql.org? > (Alternatively, would stretch have OpenSSL 1.0 next to 1.1? This seems > unlikely, but just to confirm?) This is not my plan. Kurt
