Your message dated Thu, 4 Aug 2016 19:00:44 +0200
with message-id <2dd9e551-3d5e-1e8c-7267-95d016e06...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#832102: transition: ftplib
has caused the Debian Bug report #832102,
regarding transition: ftplib
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
832102: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I have small transition in the ftplib package, the SONAME got
bumped but the API is fully backwards-compatible. The package
is ready in experimental and I tested that the build of the 4 reverse
dependencies still succeeds against the new library.
I took this opportunity to rename "ftplib-dev" into "libftp-dev",
the latter providing the former so as to not break existing build
dependencies. Similarly ftplib3 morphed into libftp4.
Let me know when I can upload to unstable.
Ben file:
title = "ftplib";
is_affected = .depends ~ "ftplib3" | .depends ~ "libftp4";
is_good = .depends ~ "libftp4";
is_bad = .depends ~ "ftplib3";
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500,
'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 23/07/16 11:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 22/07/16 13:13, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Go ahead.
>>
>> Uploaded (4.0-1-2).
>>
>>> The provides is not enough while the old package is still available, as real
>>> packages are preferred. We'll need to get the old -dev decrufted once
>>> ftplib is
>>> built everywhere, so the new one is picked up. Then we can schedule the
>>> binNMUs.
>>> Hmm, or probably some --extra-depends on the new package will suffice.
>>
>> I also had to build a fake ftplib-dev for my test rebuilds to pick up the
>> new package. I filed #832050 on sbuild due to this.
>
> binNMUs scheduled.
This is over.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
