On 15/07/16 at 00:23 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > Great. We can handle that for Stretch. You can send a ping to the bug > > reports > > saying that these are going to be RC for Stretch and that you will bump them > > after a week, and then do that. > > Hi. The pings have been sent. Bugs of type "pending upload" and "patch > available" > yesterday, bugs of type "unclassified" today. Will probably bump severities > during the weeking of next week. > > Thanks a lot.
Hi, I did some work to verify Santiago's list of affected packages, and identified more affected packages. The additional bugs I filed are at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=qa-indep;users=debian...@lists.debian.org (I didn't want to directly tag them using Santiago's tag in case some manual screening was wanted.) I only filed them as severity: important. Feel free to bump the severity to serious when you see fit. I already mentioned in the bug reports that severity will be set to serious at some point, and pointed to this bug. Also, I ran into #805228 which causes build failures for many Java packages (which Santiago already identified). That bug should probably be set serious at the same time as the initial set. Once that bug is fixed, the affected Java packages should be build-tested again. (list available in #805228) Lucas
