On 24/06/16 20:05, Robie Basak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:53:56PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >> Please don't use virtual-foo for non-virtual packages, that way lies >> madness and confusion and despair :) > > OK, but does anyone have any objection to the principle of my > suggestion, even if we must use a different name?
You could do something like that. Or something like what we do with default-mta and mail-transport-agent. Cheers, Emilio
