On 2016-04-08 10:15:02, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 16:15:36 -0400, anarcat wrote:
>
>> It would also make sense NSS is basically part of Firefox, which *has*
>> the same version in all suites.
>>
> That's a weird argument. nss is a library, firefox isn't. Unless
> you're arguing for removing all nss rdeps just as happened a few years
> ago to xulrunner rdeps, but then why have an nss package at all.
I am not arguing for removing all the NSS rdeps, of course. My point is
more that the NSS library seems to be more or less ABI stable across
releases - Chromium 49 seems to use the 3.14 in Jessie and 3.17 in Sid
without any ill effects...
But maybe I'm missing something obvious here.
A.
--
Le monochrome, c'est pour ceux qui s'intéressent (encore) au contenu.
Usenet dans ces conditions, c'est comme le web avec lynx, on prend
trop conscience du vide, c'est déprimant.
- JLC dans le Guide du linuxien pervers:
"Coup de cafard..."
