Kurt Roeckx: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:20:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >> I don't think dlopen(libssl) vs gcc -lssl makes any difference >> licensing-wise, I suspect either they're both ok or they're both not >> ok... > > I assume the problem is not with Qt itself, but with other > applications making use of Qt.
That's my understanding of the situation too, yes. I've been discussing the mumble openssl transition issue with one of the Qt maintainers in #818943. There's a hackish idea of building a tiny dummy Qt application or library that has OpenSSL as a dependency that could be shipped alongside qtnetwork, in order to have part of Qt depend on OpenSSL and thus have it binNMUed for OpenSSL transitions. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us
