On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 21:23, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 21:14 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 20:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 10:16 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > > > And the patches... > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > While I'm generally more comfortable (happier's not really the right > > > word) with the changes, it looks like some of the changes aren't applied > > > in unstable - particularly the disabling of TLS compression and the > > > fixes for the CVEs; is that correct, or am I missing something? > > > > Hmm, I though that 2.4.18 upstream version included both, which is true > > for TLS-configuration.patch, CVE-2011-3208.patch and > > CVE-2015-8076.patch, but it looks like CVE-2015-8077.patch and > > CVE-2015-8078.patch: > > In terms of the TLS changes, the 2.4.18 currently in unstable appears to > include the compression disabling in imtest/imtest.c but not the changes > in imap/tls.c afaict.
$ patch -p1 --dry-run -i /tmp/TLS-configuration.patch checking file imap/tls.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 6 out of 6 hunks ignored checking file lib/imapoptions Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored Or do you have anything else on mind and I just can't see it? Cheers, -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
