On 03/03/16 04:52, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:10:54PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 02/03/16 13:25, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >>> Emilio, >>> >>> I think we're quite close to be able to drop 2.2 - it's already in >>> experimental, we're quite confident it works, etc. >>> >>> Right now we know that uwsgi and weechat will need manual fixing and >>> there are open bugs against them (#816315, #816312). >>> >>> When do you think it would be ok for us to drop 2.2? We'll need >>> another round of binNMUs for all the packages listed on the tracker. >>> (We're running another test rebuild of those right now.) >> >> You can go ahead. > > So I have uploaded ruby-defaults making the switch on unstable earlier > today. Please binNMU the following packages: > > broccoli-ruby > geos > graphviz > marisa > ngraph-gtk > notmuch > qtruby > redland-bindings > ruby-standalone > rubyluabridge > subversion > treil > vim > vim-command-t > libguestfs
Scheduled. I've also scheduled zeroc-ice as that can be built on the buildds (the bad packages are in Build-Depends-Indep and the buildds don't install those except for arch:all builds). Emilio
