On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 20:53 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-02-24 19:42:57 [+0000], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 09:45 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > On 2016-02-22 22:42:47 [+0000], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Please go ahead. > > > > > > Thanks, done. > > > > clamav itself has now built everywhere - yay - but we still need to deal > > with the FTBFS of c-icap-modules (which doesn't appear to be clamav's > > fault, but is blocking this being complete). > > The last time we looked, the pointers were: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768684 > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/c-icap.git/plain/debian/patches/0010-Rename-CONF-to-C_ICAP_CONF.patch?h=debian/1%250.3.4-2&id=17cc5a80958526a495392653e944ad6aad8ff883
Thanks. > Scott, wanted to look at this but I don't know about his timming / > workload atm. However, we want to complete this :) > How would you like to see this done (assuming the patch in question > fixes the issue)? Should we just prepare a +deb7u1 c-icap package and > open a p-u bug (which kind of looks like NMU) or should we involve the > current maintainer of this package? It's not that unusual for a stable update to be performed by someone other than the maintainer. I don't think I particularly know the c-icap maintainer, but as a compromise maybe open the bug with an X-Debbugs-CC to them saying you're happy to handle it? Regards, Adam
