On 2016-02-20 19:00, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > The piuparts jessie2proposed log for ruby-activesupport-2.3 from the > recent(ish) rails DSA fails with:
https://piuparts.debian.org/jessie2proposed/fail/ruby-activesupport-2.3_2:4.1.8-1+deb8u1.log > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > ruby-activesupport-2.3 : Depends: ruby-activesupport (>= 2:4) but it is > not going to be installed > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. This already fails in plain jessie: https://piuparts.debian.org/jessie/affected/ruby-activesupport-2.3_2:4.1.8-1.log > I suspect this is due to #798712, which the ruby-defaults 1:2.1.5+deb8u2 > upload in p-u fixes. Correct. > Would a jessie2proposed test pull in just the > single package being tested from p-u, or should it also install versions > of dependent packages from p-u as well? jessie2proposed won't help here. That test starts with a installation from plain jessie, which already fails. Thereafter jessie-proposed-updates would get added to the sources.list and a dist-upgrade would be performed. So dependencies would be resolved from pu as well. But jessie-pu does: https://piuparts.debian.org/jessie-pu/pass/ruby-activesupport-2.3_2:4.1.8-1+deb8u1.log (initial installation from jessie + jessie-proposed-updates) Andreas
