On 04/02/16 18:18, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:48:32PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 30/01/16 01:18, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >>> Hi, Andreas. >>> >>> Thanks for this mail and work! >>> I was just thinking the migration of this broken library. >> >> Unfortunately the versioned -dev package means every rdep needs a sourceful >> upload to build against the new version. It'd be good to switch to an >> unversioned -dev... > > umh, actually, there is a 'Provides: libopenobex-dev', shouldn't be that > enough for this?
Yes. Though as you say... > From what I can see no rdep use the unversioned virtual package, but > this could be a good occasion to have them switch to it? Packages still need sourceful uploads, and unless it is pointed to them, I bet they will switch to libopenobex2-dev, requiring yet another change when the SONAME changes again. So it'd be good to explicitly mention the unversioned libopenobex-dev build-dependency. Cheers, Emilio
