On 14/01/16 16:45, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Followup-For: Bug #796835 > > I had a look at the state of the ncurses transition and found > a few packages have been missed and were not binNMUed, yet: > > nmu trn_3.6-24 . i386 . "Rebuild against ncurses 6.0." > # (maintainer uploaded trn binaries built on outdated system) > nmu newsbeuter_2.8-2 . ANY . "Rebuild against ncurses 6.0." > nmu gdb-avr_7.7-2 . ANY . "Rebuild against ncurses 6.0." > nmu sendfile_2.1b.20080616-5.3 . kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 hurd-i386 . > "Rebuild against ncurses 6.0." > nmu yacpi_3.0-2 . ANY . "Rebuild against ncurses 6.0." > nmu heimdal_1.6~rc2+dfsg-10 . ANY . "Rebuild against ncurses 6.0." > # (libsl0-heimdal will pick up a new dependency on libtinfo5) > nmu logol_1.7.2-2 . ANY . "Rebuild against ncurses 6.0." > # (logol-bin should pick up a versioned dependency on libncursesw5)
All scheduled. > I built and uploaded a few binNMUs for non-free non-autobuild > packages: frobtads, ngspice, tome. Great! > The ben file should probably be adjusted and also accept > libncursesw?5-dev as good (affects e.g. ecl, r-base). Or just not consider that as affected. Cheers, Emilio
